Undergraduate business education faces a lot of criticism spanning from lack of practical training to philosophical arguments that management shouldn’t be taught at undergraduate level at all. I cannot change the status quo and won’t try to repeat these statements - I will try to give a constructive feedback. What I propose in this article is very easy to implement: it will just require change in the attitude.
Since young business majors lack experience to relate with the curriculum, it will be healthy to inject a dose of pessimism into the courses to keep students engaged…
I claim that undergraduate business education does not focus enough on the negative aspects of business environment. While this may be great for MBA students or rising seniors who have business experience or did internships and can relate to the subject matter of the textbooks, inexperienced undergrads have to visualize every aspect in their minds. This places reading a management textbook on the same ground as reading a fantasy novel - both build and explain new worlds. But as everyone would agree, “The Lord of the Rings” is much more interesting than “Silmarillion”, because while the former focuses on the conflict of races, the latter just explores The Middle Earth. The same argument can be provided to explain why economics is the most popular course among business majors - its main topic is scarcity and tradeoffs, “you cannot have a free lunch”. To illustrate why current educational approach is not optimal, let’s look at a few examples.
Richard Daft’s “New era of management” calls the matrix structure of management “controversial” but spends only half of the paragraph about the disadvantages of the matrix structure. Technically, it does justice and uses 7 sentences to describe disadvantages and 4 sentences to describe advantages, but what I propose is to focus on these controversies and tell “how this structure struggles to exist despite the clear problems, which are, by the way, unsolvable”.
Keegan’s “Global marketing” textbook uses a fancy phrase “Think globally, act locally” as a motto and tries to prove the case throughout the book. I would suggest presenting the same idea in a darker manner, as conflict between liberal and conservative thought and how difficult it is to bring both to the consensus.
In contrast to the above, Commercial Law, for example, is very engaging to business students despite being a law course because it illustrates the incompatibilities between GATT’s MFN and FTA principles, it focuses on court cases which are intrinsically conflict stories.
To sum up, since freshman/sophomore undergraduate business students lack experience to relate with the curriculum, it will be healthy to inject a dose of pessimism/conflict into the courses to keep students engaged.